The formal courts should be the last resort when resolving a dispute. I hold that the old system of arbitration done by tribal chiefs and shaman is correct, only, instead of one arbiter broadly judging for a small group, we should rely on informal arbiters, as I have been referring to. Thus, on one hand, I am an arbiter of taste in art [a critic], and on another I am an arbiter of taste in technology [architect]. People retain reputations as arbiters and other people go to them for counsel.
If everybody learns to use this, reputation capital becomes a reality, and the legal system becomes less burdened. Then the courts can be as slow or as fast as is desirable by the arbiters of policy. ;-)
