"J. van Baardwijk" wrote:
>
> At 06:25 13-07-2002 -0400, Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> >Perhaps there was a point to it.
>
> A point to what?
>
> (You know, if you would quote the relevant part of the post you are
> replying to, maybe your posts would start making sense.)
He was replying to the message from you which follows below. If you
want me to point out just exactly which message he's replying to in
other cases, contact me off-list.
Julia
At 09:59 12-07-2002 -0500, Julia Thompson wrote:
> > >Tangled rope smallest prime chivalry practicioner, comb for a bee, naval
> > >affirmative separate into two equals Canadian interrogative brain holder
> > >disk or drum minus onomatopoeiac expression of cold.
> >
> > Looks like Erik has finally gone off the deep end. Had to happen some time.
>
>Looks like Jeroen didn't want to take the time to figure out a simple
>rebus and figured he'd take a shot at the inventor of it instead.
Given Erik's earlier replies to my posts, I had no reason to see his
post
as some form of puzzle, but every reason to believe he was being his
usual
obnoxious self. Ridiculing your opponent by posting nonsense is a common
practice with people (like Erik) who like to attack people and then try
to
get away with it.
Jeroen
