> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Verzonden: dinsdag 16 juli 2002 6:08 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: Goodbye (was Re: Demanding change (was RE: Mmm, mesquite > smoky goodness (was Re: (~) Please.)))
> > >No one forces you to spam. Only you think its a viable alternative. > > > > As if I have much of a choice. I cannot e-mail him off-list because > > of a filter he set that bounces my messages back. Therefore, the > > alternatives are (1) keep asking on-list, or (2) drag him to court > > and sue him for every penny he's got. > > Jeroen, I think you have options other than the ones you enumerate > above. Such as? Torture him? Execute him? Accept that on this list I am denied the right of self-defense? > He is not causing you any immediate physical harm. Ah, so that is the current criterion? As long as you are not physically harmed, you should shut up and not defend yourself when attacked? Then why are people pushing me to shut up? Nobody is getting physically harmed by my posts. As Erik said, they could ignore whatever they do not like to read. Every current half-decent e-mail client allows the user to set filters. Use them. > The only thing you can truly control in this situation is your mental > and emotional response to him. He's not "making" you do anything; you > are choosing to react to him in the manner you are. Yeah, having an highly developed sense of Right & Wrong can be quite a nuisance. Especially to others... :-( Jeroen _________________________________________________________________________ Corrupted World of Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
