> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO
[snip]
> I know I am not mentally ill, but Erik claims that I am, and claims he can
> prove it. I cannot shoot holes in his "evidence" if he refuses to show it,
> so I demand that he provides that evidence.
And so what if he makes such a claim? Who is Erik to pass judgment on you?
If you must prove something, prove that you can remain self-assured and calm
in the face of obviously ridiculous accusations. When you can *show* sanity
and socialization, that's a much more powerful "defense" than what you've
been doing.
> Jeroen -- still demanding that Erik provide the proof and answers
How reasonable and self-assured is it to *demand* that he produce something
that you *insist* he cannot? Isn't that more than a bit ridiculous?
Jeroen, you have a lot to offer here. Your different perspectives are
thought-provoking. But they're getting lost in the rest.
Nick
