>  > This round, to my amazement, the hate mail from SW
>>  fanatics is just 5%.  90% have been supportive... though often with
>>  an intelligent quibble or question.  My kind of people!
>>
>You should write something _in favour_ of The Fellowship of
>the Rings The Movie, and against Tolkien's rig. _Then_ you
>would see a real flood of hate mail! <evil grin>
>
>Alberto Monteiro

Ahem...


http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/archives/000193.html



I'm sick and tired of reading about how the Lord of the Rings movie 
is different from the book and hence inferior, so I thought I would 
start keeping a list of elements in Peter Jackson's movie that I 
think (and that others think) are clearly superior to their 
counterparts in Tolkien's book:

Improvement in the Logic of the Plot: Galadriel's opening, explaining 
just how it happens to be that the ring is still around--just why 
Isildur did not wish to/could not destroy it: "But the hearts of men 
are easily corrupted. And the ring has a will of its own."

Improvement in Characterization: Gandalf's panic when he discovers 
that it is indeed the One Ring that Frodo possesses, and Gandalf's 
desperate desire to seek help, especially the help of his friend, 
mentor, and leader Saruman, for "he is both wise and powerful. He 
will know what to do."

Major Plot Hole Closed: Recall what happens in the book when Gandalf 
discovers that Frodo has the One Ring. Gandalf keeps the news a 
secret, and tells Frodo, "Hang out in the Shire for six months or so, 
and then we will all mosey on off toward Rivendell." This makes no 
sense. Gandalf's first reaction to learning the identity of the ring 
should be to get it to a safe location. His second reaction should be 
to seek help. As long as Gandalf is ignorant of the Treason of 
Isengard, he should immediately inform the other Maia- and 
near-Maia-class good guys in Middle Earth--Saruman, Rhadagast, the 
Blue Wizards, Cirdan, Elrond, Glorfindel, and Galadriel--of what is 
going on. Instead, in the book he tells nothing to anyone save 
Aragorn. The only reason that Elrond has scouts out is that Gildor 
Inglorion of the House of Finrod sends back a message that Frodo is 
bearing a "great burden without guidance"--but I do not believe that 
Gildor knows what the burden is. By contrast, in the movie Gandalf's 
reaction to discovering the identity of the Ring is to immediately 
try to mobilize the White Council, and get the Wise thinking about 
what needs to be done. He rides to Isengard to tell Saruman what he 
has learned and get help. In the book, it genuinely does seem as if, 
as Saruman tells Gandalf, "your love of the halfling's leaf has 
clouded your mind."

(Adrian Hon) Improvement in Characterization: The excission of Tom Bombadil.

Improvement in Characterization: The replacement of Glorfindel by 
Arwen in the "flight to the ford" sequence. Given how powerful 
Glorfindel is said to be in the book, his failure to play any role at 
all in the rest of the trilogy is a big puzzle: this is, after all, 
the same guy who fought Gothmog, Lord of Balrogs, to a standstill 
during the fall of Gondolin.

Improvement in Characterization: Elrond's view of human "weakness" as 
revealed by his comments about men and his detailed memories of 
Isildur's unwillingness to/inability to destroy the ring.

Improvement in Plot: The byplay between Elrond and Gandalf, in which 
Gandalf says that the hobbits have already done much more than could 
possibly be asked of them, and that they deserve to return to the 
Shire. Elrond responds that with the treason of Isengard "the list of 
our allies grows thin," and that the Wise need to use every weapon 
they have--and the stubborn resistance of hobbits to the ring's evil 
is one of those weapons.

Improvement in Characterization: Aragorn's fear in Rivendell that he 
will prove too weak, just as his ancestor Isildur proved too weak 
when the test came.

(Dian Tarb) Improvement in Characterization: Aragorn's visible 
reluctance to be king and uncertainty about whether he was worthy to 
be king added depth to the character.

Improvement in Characterization: The sharpening of the 
Aragorn-Boromir conflict: "Gondor has no king. Gondor needs no king."

(Jane Falconer) Improvement in Characterization: The added depth 
provided by the scenes in Rivendell to Frodo's decision to volunteer 
to take the ring to Mordor.

(Dian Tarb) Improvement in Plot: The details of the treason of 
Isengard, the creation of the Uruk-Hai, and the ecological 
devastation wrought by Saruman. Thus the appearance of the Uruk-Hai 
and the Ents in the Two Towers will not come as such a surprise: In 
the book Tolkien makes almost no effort to prepare us for either.

(Adrian Hon) Improvement in Characterization: The transformation of 
Isengard into a war city is extremely well done.

Improvement in Plot: Saruman casting his spells from the tower of 
Orthanc to affect the weather on Caradhras.

(Adrian Hon) Improvement in Plot: The Moria scenes.

Major Plot Hole Closed: In the book Gandalf does not know what it is 
he faces in Moria until the Bridge of Khazad-Dum itself. He says 
things like "its power was terrible." But it doesn't seem to occur to 
him that it is the--well-known to both Gimli and Legolas as Durin's 
Bane--balrog. Are we really expected to believe that Olorin the Maia 
does not recognize the feel of the power of another Maia? In the 
movie, it is pretty clear that both Saruman and Gandalf know well 
what lurks at the bottom of Moria--and thus why Gandalf is so 
reluctant to take the Moria road. The plot hangs together better if 
Gandalf knows that inside the Mines of Moria is one of the other 
Maia-class beings in Middle-Earth, knows that it is one of the very 
few things in Middle-Earth that might well be able to kill him, and 
thus knows what he is getting into when he enters the Black Pit.

Improvement in Plot: Galadriel's warning that the ring is beginning 
to work its corrupting effect on all the big people in the 
fellowship--that the whole thing (not just Boromir) is beginning to 
break. The result is a much clearer motivation of Frodo's decision to 
strike off for Mordor on his own.

Improvement in Plot: Galadriel's message to Samwise: that there is 
still hope as long as he, Samwise, remains true to Frodo.

(Jane Falconer) Improvement in Characterization: Boromir's death as 
the moment when Aragorn realizes that he cannot avoid taking on the 
burden of kingship: even though he fears it, it is his burden to try 
to bear.

Improvement in Characterization: Boromir's death sequence, and his 
swearing allegiance to Aragorn as "my brother, my captain, and my 
king"; coupled with Aragorn's oath not to let the White City fall.

Major Plot Hole Closed: In the book, why doesn't Aragorn follow Frodo 
and Sam when they strike out for Mordor? Destroying the ring is job 
1. Thus helping the ringbearer is job 1.1. Aragorn's sword might well 
make the difference, so he should be following them as they strike 
out from Anduin for Mordor (if only to protect them from Gollum). In 
the movie, however, Frodo explicitly tells Aragorn that he can be of 
no further help: men are weak, and the one thing Aragorn cannot 
protect Frodo against is a ring-maddened Aragorn. Thus the best thing 
that Aragorn can do is get out of the zone of influence of the ring 
so it cannot corrupt him. In addition, in the movie Aragorn swears to 
Boromir as Boromir dies that Aragorn will not let the White City (of 
Minas Tirith) fall. Thus there are two powerful and explicit reasons 
for Aragorn to let Frodo go. By contrast, in the book this decision 
is not well motivated at all: I remember that when I first read the 
Two Towers, my reaction to learning at its beginning that Aragorn, 
Legolas, and Gimli were heading *away* from the ring at full speed 
was "huh?"



Other Nice Movie Touches:
------------------------

Merry and Pippin in the Prancing Pony: "This, my friend, is a pint." 
"They come in pints?"

Saruman: "Your love of the halfling's leaf has clouded your mind."

Aragorn: "Let's hunt some orc."

Gimli: "Nobody tosses a dwarf."

The Nine were much more terrifying than I had imagined they could be 
on film--and their twin weaknesses to fire and water were well-done 
as well.

Hobbiton was much better done than I had imagined could be done on film.





-- 
J. Bradford DeLong



"I'd much rather lose the ability to control a few toes than lose all 
my emails with no hope of retrieval. There's more of "me" in those 
emails than there is in my toes."

                                                --Rich Baker
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to