At 09:48 PM 9/28/2002 -0500 Robert Seeberger wrote: >http://www.cnn.com/2002/EDUCATION/09/26/creationism.evolution/index.html
The policy presented here doesn't seem that bad at all. Especially if it is interpreted as counting "intelligent design" as an "alternative" to evolution. I personally think that they are basically the same thing, but it seems that some people are satisfied that it is a viable alternative. JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
