Dan Minette wrote: > >>> No, it should be "ungooder" >> >> Oh, Alberto, you are about 18 years out of date. >> > > Actually, you didn't get it right for 18 years ago, > so maybe you didn't mean that. It should have > been plus ungood. > No, _plus_ is the prefix for superlatives. "double plus good" is very, very, good. Alberto Monteiro PS: I didn't get Julia's reply to my message. Maybe it's coming. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Re: English, was: Intelle... Dan Minette
- Re: English, was: Int... Deborah Harrell
- Re: English, was: Int... Dan Minette
- Re: English, was: Int... Erik Reuter
- Re: English, was: Int... Julia Thompson
- Re: English, was: Int... Dan Minette
- Re: English, was: Int... Julia Thompson
- Re: English, was: Int... Matt Grimaldi
- Re: English, was: Int... Robert Seeberger
- Pun Fight! (was: Re: ... Matt Grimaldi
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab Worl... Dan Minette
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab ... Julia Thompson
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab Worl... Julia Thompson
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World The Fool
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab Worl... Julia Thompson
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab ... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World The Fool
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab Worl... Julia Thompson
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab World Jon Gabriel
- Re: Intellectual output from the Arab Worl... Julia Thompson
