Concerning the EU and federalism, there is actually an argument that has
immediate relevance to what has been discussed here.
In brief, the point is that power and responsibility should go hand in
hand. The idea of strengthening the European Union is precisely aimed at
improving both (1) accountability and (2) efficiency.
Foreign policy decisions, at the moment, require unanimity. This means that
all EU countries must agree in order to take significant collective action.
In other words, as far as foreign policy is concerned, the EU does not
really exist, but it is simply an administrative umbrella (little more than
a collective name tag) under which politicians can conveniently hide their
faces from the voting public.
As several commentators have said already, when a European politician has
to take an unpopular decision that may compromise his chances of
reelection, he only has to take on the magic hat of the EU, and the public
instantly begins blaming somebody else. This is a politician's dream come
true (so it is not surprising that the "Eurosceptic" camp keeps on
growing), and it obviously does not encourage responsible behaviour.
Those same politicians, of course, would say that they are defending the
"national interests". In fact, those interests are often convenient excuses
for taking no decisions at all, and for relying on US intervention. The
irony of it all is, that there is no logical argument whereby German
national interests, say, should be as a rule more foreign to French
interests than American national interests. It is often a question of
avoiding responsibility and difficult decisions.
European Monetary Union was launched with these considerations in mind. A
currency area without a foreign policy, though, is a strange creature
indeed. Historically, the purse and the sword tend to go together. Who will
make EU policy and take responsibility for it? Unelected bankers in
Frankfurt? Fifteen diplomats meeting in secret? A "high representative" of
some alchemic assembly? The White House?
The application of democratic principles to supernational institutions is
in its infancy, but nobody knows of a better method to achieve both
efficiency and accountability simultaneously. So the federalist model is at
least aesthetically appealing.
Carlo
_________________________________________________________________
�����������ѽ��н�������ʹ�� MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/lccn/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Re: brin: war d.brin
- Re: brin: war Medievalbk
- RE: brin: war Horn, John
- Re: brin: war Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: brin: war Alberto Monteiro
- Re: brin: war Medievalbk
- RE: brin: war Jim Sharkey
- RE: brin: war J. van Baardwijk
- RE: brin: war d.brin
- Re: brin: war William T Goodall
- Re: brin: war HE Uthacalthing
- Re: brin: war Alberto Monteiro
- RE: brin: war Kevin Street
- Re: brin: war The Fool
- RE: brin: war Jean-Louis Couturier
- Re: br!n: war Erik Reuter
- Re: br!n: war Julia Thompson
- Re: br!n: war Erik Reuter
- OFF-LIST Re: br�n: war Ronn Blankenship
- Re: OFF-LIST Re: br�n: war Julia Thompson
- Re: OFF-LIST Re: br�n: war Julia Thompson
