Erik Reuter wrote:
The point is obvious. If the way to combat terrorism and the threat of WMD is to attack and subdue sovereign nations, it would seem that we are undertaking a war that we can not win and that has the potential to escalate into a wider more violent confrontation. If we aren't going to go after everyone we consider a threat, why go after anyone? Do you think that Bush is going to go conquer Iraq and then declare the War on Terrorism victorious?To use Nick's favorite phrase, that is a straw man. I haven't heard anyone but you suggesting going after every bad guy. What is your point?
Doug
Regime Change in '04!
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
