----- Original Message ----- From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:14 PM Subject: Sillier and sillier Re: Question for everyone
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > In a message dated 10/29/2002 2:44:40 PM US Mountain Standard Time, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > << L8 post on the minutia of the > > > philosophy of science. <grin> > > > > Ooh! I want to read this. I hereby bandy the reliability of data and the > > certainty of observation!! >> > > > > L8? How can one read a post that's late and hasn't arrived yet? By using time reversal, of course. Actually, backwards signals in time are required in one of the more prominant realistic interpretations of QM. > Heh heh heh. > > L8 in this case means significantly longer than L3, which is the tag for > longish messages. (There's a thread which includes "L3er" in the > subject line, meaning "longer than L3.) > > But I very much like your question. :) > > > If one is going to bandy the reliability of data and the > > certainty of observation, then there will be a certainty of > > decreased observation based upon the reliability of the > > brandy being served during the observation. > > Brandy? Where? > > Oh, never mind, I prefer port, anyway. Then the recent weather we've been having would have offered you many excuses: any port in a storm. That 8" in 3 hours was a good rain. > > Duck? DUCK? Are you sure you're not a witch? ;) Ducks liked it too. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
