Jean-Louis Couturier wrote: > De : Deborah Harrell [mailto:harrellmedleg@;yahoo.com] > > And after further consideration, I have to agree with > > Erik that anonymous dinging should be severely > > penalized. If allowed at all. And you ought to try > > talking it out offlist first [*politely*], as somebody > > has already suggested. > > I don't think anonymous dinging should be allowed at all. > If you're willing to penalize someone, you should be ready > to suffer the consequences, which include having the dingee > pi**ed at you. > > I'd rather just not have dinging at all. I'm very effec- > tive at deleting emails which I don't feel like reading.
I'm with you on that one for 100%. Indeed, better to have no dinging. Ignoring what you don't like, respond to what is interesting. We used to be able to do that quite well in the very far back past. Now the list gets clogged with explainations, of explanations, of disagreements of explanations, of explanations, of..... you get my drift.... ;o) Sonja _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
