The Fool wrote:
>
> http://www.whitehouse.org/news/2002/110602.asp
>
1) That was kinda tacky.
2) It doesn't accurately correlate with the speech patterns I'm used to
from Bush. Was that thing written by someone from New York or
something? If you're going to do good parody, getting the speech
patterns down is essential, or people are going to see right through it
and consider it a hack, rather than something more closely resembling a
work of art. Good parody trumps a hack any day, IMO.
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
