On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:19:54PM +1000, Russell Chapman wrote: > The restricted MAC address option of William's would be a better > option - he has few enough computers to make it viable and it doesn't > have the performance downside of WEP.
I think the MAC address is probably in the packet headers, so anyone scanning the packets could see it and forge it. But it does add another degree of difficulty. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
