The Fool wrote: > > Which comes out to about (5*10^14)! pathways. >(this is an astronomical number, much larger than the > projected # of subatomic particles in the > universe). > Bah. I bet economists will come up with something that beats even this number (10^1642281460717540 or so) Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- and so it begins The Fool
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
- Re: and so it begins The Fool
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
- Re: and so it begins The Fool
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
- Re: and so it begins Alberto Monteiro
- Re: and so it begins The Fool
- Re: and so it begins The Fool
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
- Complexity, nodes, state space (was RE: and so i... Nick Arnett
- Re: and so it begins Alberto Monteiro
- Re: and so it begins The Fool
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
- Re: and so it begins Erik Reuter
