The Fool wrote: 
>  
> Which comes out to about (5*10^14)! pathways. 
>(this is an astronomical number, much larger than the 
> projected # of subatomic particles in the 
> universe). 
> 
Bah. I bet economists will come up with something 
that beats even this number (10^1642281460717540 or 
so) 
  
Alberto Monteiro 
 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Reply via email to