----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 12:32 PM Subject: Posting to Brin-L
> Erik -- > > I've sent this to the list, twice now. If it doesn't appear, raise a "wtf?" > for me, will ya? > > Hey guys! > > "I'll be back to pick you up later!" > > I posted some lyrics to alt.culture.fil-am.relationships under "The bill for > this is in the mail". Interesting. Reminds me of Yrrkoon, Red Sonja, and I > think their baby is named Tom Orlious? Devious Helius Xevious? Something > like that. Yenjoy. > > Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 7:55 PM Subject: Vectors with scalar of zero > I dunno why I have to say this, but Alberto and his nek'd behind might > complain: > > There are an infinite number of vectors with a scalar of zero on a two > dimensional plane, though there are only two vectors with a scalar of zero on > a one dimensional line. So, to make the vector-cardinality proof valid > [soc.history.what-if, "non-linear equations"], I have to add that counting > all vectors with scalars of zero as one vector with a start at the origin, > the vector-cardinality proof that differentiable functions have cardinality > less than or equal to the cardinality of the set of complex numbers. Wtf do > I have to mention the details? Even these statements might have holes in > them regarding my proof. > > Mark > The question I have is "Why are you posting responses to threads on other newsgroups to Brin-L, where no one who is not subscribed to those particular newsgroups has the slightest idea what you are talking about?" -- Ronn! :) Huh? Maru _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
