In a message dated 11/27/02 6:27:40 AM US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< > Which is why I can't consider FDR to be a great President - for saddling > America's future generations with this disaster. Why is it a "disaster" if a government decides to financially help those members of the population who (for some reason) are unable to generate income themselves? >> Governments do not generate income. They can't pull money for entitlements out of thin air. I think the disaster point is when it'll take three workers to pay for one retired person. William Taylor ------------------ Intent is not a disaster. Implementation can be. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
