> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Erik Reuter

...

> >  Pick up any book on creativity and you'll find that creative people
> > are interested in everything.  (We're into an area of my expertise
> > here; IIRC, that very sentence appears on my web site.)  Metaphor is
> > powerful, so is letting a problem linger in the back of one's head.
> > Big problems are rarely solved by tackling them head-on; many are
> > serendipitous.
>
> That is mostly sensationalism and wishful thinking. It doesn't make a
> good story to say that you were working on the problem for hours and you
> solved it. It makes a great story to say you were in the bathtub and
> suddenly had to jump out and run naked to your desk to write down the
> idea that just occurred to you. Selective memory and drama.

What makes you think so?  It flies in the face of the success I've had.  Do
you have real-world experience in this area?  My successes have been at
Intel, IBM, Microsoft, Apple, etc.  Not to mention my own companies.

> > Serendipity is not something you can force to happen, but it's not
> > random, either.
>
> The first part is a tautology or a useless definition, so I'll ignore
> it, and the second part conflicts with the first.

I don't follow.  I see no conflict between the two parts.

> >  Head in an interesting direction and you're likely to find things you
> > weren't even looking for.
>
> Head in an interesting direction related to what you are working on,
> and you are likely to find useful things that will help you get your
> work done. You can't absolutely force ideas, but you can make them more
> likely.

Uh, that's what I said.

Nick

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to