The Fool wrote: > >>> 16 Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, >>> of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. >> >> I imagine that the fact that Mary was mentioned in >> this sentence might be interpreted as Jacob being >> _her_ father and not Joseph. You know, translation >> errors from Aramaic to Greek, etc. > > You can delude yourself all you want, but it says > 'father to Joseph'. > No, it doesn't. This is the horrible and full of mistakes King James "translation". We have to get the 'rig to get the right meaning. Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be eradi... Alberto Monteiro
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... The Fool
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... Alberto Monteiro
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... The Fool
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... Medievalbk
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... Alberto Monteiro
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must... William T Goodall
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... The Fool
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... Medievalbk
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... Alberto Monteiro
- Re: king james translation is evil, why it must be ... The Fool
