On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:43:25AM -0800, Nick Arnett wrote: > All this study indicates to me is normal behavior: citations are often > copied *before* a paper is read. The more likely mistake, IMO, was the > failure to check if the original citation contained errors.
Ha, we had the same conclusion but from different directions. I basically said that the citation was copied some time AFTER the paper was read, and you mention that the citation could have been copied BEFORE the paper was read. I guess we've got the temporal bases covered, huh? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
