On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Jon Gabriel wrote: > Disclaimer: I've never been a wrestling fan and am almost totally ignorant > on the subject. > > But, female bodybuilders usually are small-busted. Aren't female wrestlers > the same? Wouldn't logic suggest that a bulked up wrestler would likely be > less well endowed than say, a playboy playmate?
Well, I was assuming *male* rastlers. But if channel-surfing has taught me anything, it's that lady rastlers are far more volumetrically endowed than lady competetive bodybuilders. Assuming that the standards driving decision-making are competition- and market-based, rather then aesthetic, I'd guess that preturnatural endowments on a lady rastler are an advantage because rastlin' is chiefly showbiz. On a competitive bodybuilder they are a disadvantage because bodybuilding is judged based on the technical merits of the musculature beneath the endowments, and not on the endowments themselves. In theory, anyway. I realize it takes a leap of faith to assume that bodybuilding judges are capable of looking past endowments in the first place. Marvin Long Austin, Texas Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Poindexter & Ashcroft, LLP (Formerly the USA) _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
