Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> Great snippage follows; I cut out the large middle part of each of
> John's paragraphs below.
>
> "John D. Giorgis" wrote:
> >
> > After nailing all four games last week, I try to extend my perfect playoff
> > record on the way to the Super Bowl.....
> >
> > Pittsburgh at Tennessee - I like the TITANS by at least two scores.
>
> I like the Titans, as well.
John and Julia both right.
> > Atlanta and Philadelphia - Remaining inexorably Super Bowl bound, I
> > like the FALCONS by a touchdown. (Heaven knows with their kicker they
> > won't be winning by a field goal!) UPSET SPECIAL
>
> I'll pick the Falcons, as well. I was wrong about them last week. :)
John and Julia both wrong.
> > San Francisco at Tampa Bay - So the pick is the BUCCANEERS by a field goal.
>
> I pick the Bucs as well, in keeping with my (probably wrong) calling of
> the Superbowl.
John and Julia both right for the winner, but John was just a *leetle*
off on the spread. :) (Well, only off by what, 22 points?)
> > NY Jets at Oakland - Thus, I like the J-E-T-S, JETS, JETS, JETS in a
> > big way on Sunday to keep my other Super Bowl pick alive.
>
> Here's where I'll disagree with John; I did, after all, pick Oakland to
> win the Superbowl. :)
Julia got this one right.
So, John is 2-2 for the weekend, Julia 3-1.
Julia's picks for next weekend:
Tampa Bay beats Philadelphia.
Oakland beats Tennessee.
(And if she doesn't go 2-0 next weekend, her Superbowl prediction
doesn't come true.)
Julia
wondering why the heck she used avoided use of the first person in this
post
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
