At 12:49 PM 1/25/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Ronn! Blankenship wrote:But who are you to call her "carpetbagger"? I would think that that would be up to the people in the state she ran in. I'm convinced that a good deal of the hatred of HRC has to do with a deep seated fear of strong-willed women, not that that is the case with you.At 12:51 AM 1/25/03 -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:I find it fascinating that the only people I ever hear complaining about Senator Hillary Clinton are non-New Yorkers. Obvious Republican mouthpieces like the NY Post, Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh notwithstanding, I've only *very* rarely heard on-the-street New Yorkers complain about our junior senator. I think too many out-of-towners have simply decided that she's guilty of something nefarious by association.
No. Those of us who don't want such things as her version of nationalized health care see her main, if not only reason, for running for Senator was as a stepping stone to running for President.
What are your objections to nationalized health care?
Doug
GSV Here we go!
Did someone call her a carpetbagger? Why didn't she run in Illinois, or rkansas? What she does is important to the whole country, her votes don't effect just new yawk as if she were a state senator.
I was going to ding you for the strong women crack, but I know you aren't making it against people on the list. I'm tending to agree with you.
The objections to nat HC are the same to nat anything. I won't list objections. Either you like the idea or you don't, nothing we say can swing peoples minds. But I will say that any decision will be something we always have, it is so tough to go back once it's in place.
Kevin T.
Time to go
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
