At 14:06 2003-01-29 -0800, Gautam wrote:
No.  I think that arguing that France and Germany are
selfless is, almost by definition, ridiculous - when
have they _ever_ acted in such a way?  If you say that
about the US, it's at least possible.  It has
happened.
It has happened post WWII.  Before that, France was a colonial
empire bent on dominating what parts of the world it could.  The
USA was trying to do the same, but all the good spots were already
taken.  The same holds for Germany except for the time that  they
spent recovering from WWI.

After WWII, the US did indeed show a lot of compassion.  This is
very honorable, but we could also say that after WWI, it was evident
that pettiness wouldn't lead anywhere interesting.  Furthermore, there
was a popularity contest going on between the US and the USSR.
Since then, pure generosity from the States has been scarce.

It's not a constant, or even predominant,
in American policy, but it happens every once in a
while.  The argument - made usually by the left, that
France and Germany oppose us, therefore we are wrong,
is absurd.  The argument that we need "Europe" to
support us when most of Europe _is_ supporting us
(England, Denmark, Italy, Spain, and _all_ of Eastern
Europe just for a start) is equally kind of
ridiculous.

In this particular case, we know exactly what "The
Axis of Weasel" is motivated by.  This is a largely
internal power play by the French and German
governments to secure their dominance of the EU and
challenge America's global position before the
countries of Eastern Europe - all of which are
pro-American, since they remember who stood up for
them in the Cold War and who was happy to sell them up
the river - enter the Union and weaken Franco-German
power.  Or do you think it's a coincidence that they
proposed this dual Presidency nonsense for the EU
almost simultaneously?  It's also worth pointing out
that France in particular will get significant
commercial benefits if Hussein remains in power, while
Schroeder is at _25%_ in the polls and has,
historically, attacked the United States any time he
needed a quick boost.  But all of these things are
ignored.

It is, in fact, possible to construct a coherent
argument opposing the war in Iraq.  Stanley Hoffmann
has done so in The American Prospect, for example.  I
worship the ground the man walks on, so I may disagree
with him, but it's a good argument.  It isn't, though,
possible to use as one of those planks, "The French
and Germans oppose it, so it must be immoral."  That's
absurd.
Of course it is, it's like saying that if Bush wants to go
to war with Iraq, then they must be responsible for 9-11.
Quoting the idiots from the opposing side doesn't get the
discussion anywhere.

As for do I expect people to think of America better
than America thinks of the world - well, I think
rather highly of much of the world.  My opinion of
French and German elites is, umm, less kind.  If they
want to ruthlessly pursue their own power - which is
what they are doing - then that's acceptable.  That's
what nations, on the whole, do, although the moral
preening from a bunch of effective adolescents is
tiresome.  But Americans should, instead of deciding
that these countries are avatars of all that's right
and good, understand them for precisely what they are
- two nations that would condemn, say, the people of
Iraq to life in a totalitarian dictatorship, and
Israel to genocide, if that meant improving their
commercial position or their global power.
I don't agree.  They would probably let Saddam stay
where he is just because there's no good way to oust
him.  That's the problem with this situation.  The US
has decided on its own that enough was enough.  It is
making up the rules as it goes and what the world,
including french and germans, are thinking is: what's it
going to be next time?  We're at a point in world politics
where we can start interfering in other countries' business.
That's all good and fun, but there should be rules and the
rules shouldn't be written by just one country.  If the US
insists on playing by its own rules, it should expect that
many countries won't want to play.

Jean-Louis

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to