On 4 Feb 2003 at 22:03, Richard Baker wrote:

> > The Tornados are airforce.
> 
> Yes, I said so.
> 
> > They're optimised for missile warfare. 
> 
> Well, no. The original Tornado was optimised for interdiction behind
> Red Army lines in Central Europe. When Britain badly needed a new
> fighter to replace the Lightnings and Phantoms, it was decided to
> adapt the Tornado as a second-rate modern fighter until a proper
> replacement could be developed. The Tornado Air Defence Variant (now
> the Tornado F.3) was thus born. Essentially its role wasn't the
> establishment of air superiority, but intercepting Soviet bombers over
> the North Sea.

As it was described to me, the way its avionics have been changed and 
such recently has been geared towards changing it into a platform for 
air-launched missiles. The cost has allowed us to purchase quite a 
few as well - I remember reading recently about the cost of the F-22 
is such that even the Americans are balking at buying high numbers.
 
> > The Marines have HMS Ocean, which can carry a substantual landing
> > force...
> 
> Yes, but HMS Ocean is new, having been commissioned in 1998. She only
> completed trials in 1999. They also, of course, have quite a few
> conventional amphibious assault ships, which were originally intended,
> if I recall correctly, for landings in Norway to stop the Red Army
> from capturing key strategic airfields there. There are also two newer
> ones, which are for force projection across larger distances.

Yup. We DO have substantial amphibious assualt capacity, at least.

> [developing and deploying new capabilities]
> 
> > Maybe not as long as you think. 
> 
> Long enough. For example, the Eurofighter Typhoon was conceived in the
> 1980s as a new air superiority fighter for Europe and won't be
> deployed to squadrons for a few years yet. (As mentioned above, the
> Tornado ADV was a temporary measure to provide some kind of fighter
> capability.)

We're getting the Eurofighter, but also the JSF. The JSF VTOL will be 
able to fly off our current carriers, and that should boost our power 
project capacities.

> Major warship programmes take around a decade to go from
> requirements to actual vessels. The new British airlift capability has

Yeah - the new carriers WILL take a long time but as you say most 
major warships do.

> I think it'll take until at least 2010 for the British armed forces to
> be fully reconfigured for post-Cold War duties. The other European
> militaries are presumably similarly optimised for their Cold War
> duties, and as UK defence spending is generally higher than elsewhere
> in the EU it'll probably take longer to retask them.

Well..

I think we're making a better path of it than most of the other 
European countries...

Andy
Dawn Falcon

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to