On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 07:19:45PM +0100, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2591351.stm
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2584975.stm
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2658625.stm
>
>http://newssearch.bbc.co.uk/cgi-bin/results.pl?tab=news&meta=&sortby=sortboth&q=iraq+US+weapons+embargo&scope=newsukfs&suggest=http%3A%2F%2Fnews.bbc.co.uk%2F1%2Fhi%2Fworld%2Feurope%2F2712903.stm
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2712903.stm
>
Thanks for the links. Actually, I have seen most of those stories and
I was looking for something more substantial, something that would aid
in development or use of chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons. The
names mentioned in those articles (summarized below), are related to
conventional weapons. And with the exception of missile parts from
a couple Russian firms (which is disturbing), the rest aren't even
unambiguously FOR weapons.
There are repeated claims of more detailed information in the 12,000
page Iraqi weapons dossier, and I was hoping Powell's presentation to
the UN would go into more detail on this matter, but it did not.
country name of corporation when what
or person
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Russia Livinvest helicopter parts (delivered?)
Russia Mars Rotor 1995 missile parts
Russia Niikhism 1995 missile parts
China Huawei Tech. 2000-1 fiberglass parts, air defense?
Germany Bernd Schompeter drills, maybe for boring cannons
--
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
