On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:26:25AM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote: > I don't know. I'm using Eudora (version 5.2.0.9) to read and filter > messages here. I'm not using SpamAssassin here, so I'm not sure where > the SpamAssassin stuff was added: whether Nick has been using it,
Yes > or whether it was one of the anti-spam/anti-virus programs AT&T > installed after they said a few months ago they were going to start > filtering all mail going through their servers, or what. While it is possible they could do this, it is unlikely, moreso since Nick has said he is using SA. > The only messages I have received which (1) had SpamAssassin notices > attached and/or (2) went to my "In" box rather than my "Brin-L" box > have been those in this series from you concerning Bush. I mentioned in another post some of the reasons his messages were getting tagged by SA. Mostly mail relays. > I can send you (or Nick, if he wishes) a copy of the message with the > SpamAssassin notices intact: I snipped them from the earlier message > because there were over 40 lines worth of them. There is no problem (anymore) on Nick's end, and unless you count using questionable mail relays, there is no problem on Fool's end. If there is still a problem, heal thyself. > Anyway, as I said, it's a mystery to me, Which was my point, basically. Not to make you look bad, but rather for people who have asked for you to manage to realize what they might be getting themselves into. > I'm sorry that doing so annoyed others on the list: I wasn't annoyed. I was making a point, and a few jokes. No harm, no foul. > I thought that if I was getting these messages perhaps someone else > on the list might be having the same problem and would weigh in and > the additional information might help track down where the problem was > originating. Maybe you should check the archives carefully in the future? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
