On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:27:12PM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > From: "Dan Minette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Although it includes few specifics, the plan stipulates the > > > orbiter will be safer, cheaper and require less preparation time > > > than the shuttle. > > > > Does the plan stipulate a safer, cheaper orbiter that requires less > > preparation than the plan for the space shuttle? > > That appears to be what the sentence says. Or are you reading > something into it that I am missing? (I admit to being confused by > your reply. It appears to reiterate exactly the sentence you are > responding to) The key word in Dan's reply is the second "plan". Is the plan for the orbiter better than the PLAN for the shuttle? The point is that the shuttle plan looked pretty good, the actual shuttle was pretty horrible. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
