--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deborah Harrell wrote:
> > Gautam Mukunda wrote:
> 
> > > Incidentally, the profound racism of the
> opponents of the war -
> > > people who basically claim that Arabs don't want
> to be free, deserve
> > > to live under the rule of someone like Saddam,
> and that a single
> > > American/British life isn't worth freeing
> millions of Arabs - is
> > > something that
> >
> > I'm curious about the accusation of racism and
> bigotry.  If 'not
> > fighting to free Iraqis' is racist, then what is
> ignoring the torture
> > and killings going on in Sudan and Zimbabwe?  Is
> there justification
> > for calling intervention in the Balkans but not
> Rwanda a racist
> > policy?
> 
> Okay, the phrasing was a little vague, but why do
> you interpret it in
> such an extreme way? He did not say "not fighting to
> free Iraqis is
> racist". I read it as, and I am nearly certain he
> meant, 'those who
> oppose war because they claim that Arabs don't want
> to be free are
> racist'. Doesn't that make more sense?

Yes, _your_ statement is much more clear, but in his
exact statement was "the profound racism of the
opponents of the war" - and then his definition of war
opponents.  And I used '' instead of quoting the
entire paragragh as that is my interpretation of his
statement; if I quote someone I either use "s or copy
the entire paragraph.  (Um, which I actually did.)

Debbi

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to