> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Gautam Mukunda
... > Actually, you've been the worst of anyone here, > because you are a good enough writer that you can > subtly imply what you're not willing to say outright - > that the people who disagree with you are trying to > stifle debate. Disagree with the stand that you say I'm not taking? > That's a fantasy on your part, but > it's an effective debating tactic, and I'm going to > call you on it, and keep calling you on it, because > it's wrong, and it's immoral. Shame on you. You > can't or won't get involved in the real debate, that's > fine. It's hard to have an actual debate with people who are already decided they are right. Where, in all that you're written about the decision about the war, have you expressed any suggestion that your mind isn't already made up? If it is, then there's nothing to debate. > But shame on you for implying that I'm a > fascist for examining the motives of people whose > arguments are so nonsensical that their motives need > to be examined. I still don't even know what motives you are inferring. And if I've implied that you are a fascist, then I must have implied that the similarly behaving anti-war folks are also fascists. Interest concept, the fascist peacemonger. Nick _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
