> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of iaamoac > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 5:47 AM > To: Killer Bs Discussion > Subject: Re: Conspiracy redux (was RE: Oops, Clinton Just Lied > Again....) > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did it appear in SI? Your link pointed to Scaife's paper, and > since I knew > > that John Steigerwald is a Pittsburgher, I assumed that the story > originated > > there (like so much other Clinton-bashing). > > Yes, the article noted (if you bothered to read it), that the quote > appears in this week's issue of Sports Illustrated.
If I hadn't read it, I wouldn't know who wrote it or where it appeared! It just didn't "stick" that Steigerwald was quoting SI as the of the quote. Nonetheless, my comments stand. The Tribune-Review put its own 'special' spin on it, which is what I was commenting about. SI is the source of the quote; Scaife's rag is the source of the Clinton-bashing.
> (BTW - This latest lie has apparently not yet hit the national right- > wing mainstream media.... the article only came to my attention as > part of my daily digest of Buffalo Bills news, since it discusses a > Bills item at the bottom...)
Is it possible that nobody really cares? I sure don't, but I do care to see that people know who and what is behind the reporting.
Nick
Really? So that makes it what.....three papers that attack Clinton and a few thousand that attack Bush? While we're at it, did Ford attack Carter after 1977? Did Reagan say anything about Carter after 1981? Did GHW Bush say things about Clinton after 1993 (other than when he was attacked first)? Yet it's Clinton bashing now when an article calls him on a bald-faced lie.
Kevin T. - VRWC What is air?
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
