Damon wrote: << think what would be even more illuminating about this attack is the nature of the gas. Its quite possible that it may have been a *new* non-lethal suppressive gas that had unforseen serious side-effects. Has this gas been used since? Has any report been done on the use of this gas? What kind of gas was it, exactly?
John Horn replied: <<Kind of like the gas used in Russia against the Chechyen rebels in the theater, I guess.>> Reggie Bautista added <<I'm *still* not sure how they got away with that one...>> Getting away with what? With gasing about 100 it's citizens? With saving about 700 lives including some of the foreign citizens? Or with showing the world that you *can* fight terrorists? Ilana, who believes that attack in first day would have saved lives. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
