--- "J.D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd just like to note that after a recent discussion
> in which a couple list-members got all pissy at the
> suggestion that they would not post articles to this
> list about students being prohibited from wearing
> pro-life T-Shirts at school that I am absolutely
> shocked, *shocked* I tell you, that nobody has
> forwarded this news item to the List so far....
> 
> Halliburton out of the running 
> Dick Cheney's former employer won't have lead role
> in reconstructing Iraq
>
http://money.cnn.com/2003/03/28/news/companies/Halliburton/index.htm
> 
> NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Halliburton, the energy and
> construction company once run by Vice President Dick
> Cheney, is no longer in the running for a $600
> million contract to rebuild post-war Iraq... <snip> 
> Halliburton, which declined to comment, could still
> be awarded a sub-contractor role...<snip> 
> Halliburton has won one Iraq-related job. The
> company's Kellogg Brown & Root unit this week was
> awarded a contract by the U.S. Army Corps of
> Engineers
> to put out oil fires and make emergency repairs to
> Iraq's oil infrastructure. Halliburton wouldn't
> speculate about the deal's monetary value... <snip>


> Halliburton Out of the Running 
> The construction firm once run by Dick Cheney won�t
> get a big Iraq contract  
> NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE 
>    http://www.msnbc.com/news/892259.asp
>  
>       March 28 �  After taking some political heat,
> Halliburton is stepping out of the kitchen... <snip>
        
> ...But the administration has
> come under increasingly strident criticism abroad
> and
> at the United Nations for offering postwar contracts
> only to U.S. companies. Many of the questions have
> been raised about Halliburton, which Cheney headed
> from 1995 until 2000. On Monday, the U.S. Army
> announced it had awarded a contract to extinguish
oil
> fires and restore oil infrastructure in Iraq to
> Halliburton�s Kellogg, Brown & Root engineering and
> construction division. Rep. Henry Waxman, a CA
> Democrat, later sent a letter to Lt. Gen. Robert
> Flowers, commander of the Army Corps of Engineers,
> questioning why other oil-service companies had not
> been allowed to bid...<snip>         
>        What remains unclear is whether Halliburton
> took itself out of the running for the contract, was
> asked by the Bush administration to do so or whether
> its bid was simply not deemed competitive... 
<snip> 
>      But a U.N. official who follows the issue told
> NEWSWEEK that the
> Iraq reconstruction contract probably wasn�t worth
> the bad publicity for Halliburton, which depends on
> maintaining a favorable image both in Washington and
> the Arab world (where it gets much of its
> oil-related business, and where the war is 
> increasingly unpopular)... <snip> 
>     The controversy over the awarding of the first
> postwar contracts only to U.S. companies is part of
> a larger ongoing issue of whether Iraq�s
> transformation will be more U.S.-led or
multilateral.
<snip> 
>         USAID officials say the practical demands of
> rebuilding Iraq quickly, and the legal obligation
> they
> are under to favor U.S. firms�Congress wrote such
> �aid-tying� preferences into the law�have
> drastically
> limited their choices. They point especially to the
> need for speed, which in turn requires security
> clearances; generally only U.S. companies have such
> clearances..<snip> "Normally it would take us five
to
> six months to get it done. They said you�ve got two
> months.� 
>        Even big British construction firms like
> Costain and Balfour Beatty have not been asked to
> bid as prime contractors... <snip>
>        Natsios says that in an effort to broaden the
> participants he has invoked a special provision of
> the law opening up subcontracts to friendly  
> countries.  He
> and other aid officials note that up to about 50
> percent of the work is going to be subcontracted, as
> is happening in Afghanistan. As of yet, however, no
> foreign firms have been awarded even a
> subcontracting
> role in Iraq, USAID officials said. Last week,
> British
> cabinet minister Clare Short traveled to Washington
> and complained to Natsios and other administration
> officials about the contracting process. 
>         Beans said the war�s slower-than-expected
> progress has at least one silver lining for him.
> �I�ve
> been under incredible pressure to get these things
> done,� he said. �The fact that they�ve been slowed
> down a little bit has given me a little extra time.�

I appreciated the articles; I am a little confused
about the opening comments, as the articles seemed to
be both fair toward and critical of the Admin at the
same time.  

Debbi

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to