> From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Oh, *that* post! I thought you were referring to some message > you sent (but > which I didn't receive) in reply to my initial statement. > > Thanks for clearing that up. > > > >IOW, this is NOT a case of criminal negligence. > > Doesn't look like criminal negligence to me, either.
OK. Now, what about my question? - jmh _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
