Here is an excellent graphic describing Iraq's
chemical weapons arsenal and delivery systems:
http://images.latimes.com/media/acrobat/2003-04/7268711.pdf


In other news, we may have confirmation of a "smoking
gun" in a few hours or days:
 http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20030404_495.html
Officer: Troops Find Vials of Powder
Troops Find Vials of White Powder, Documents on
Chemical Warfare Near Baghdad, Officer Says

The Associated Press
NEAR BAGHDAD, Iraq April 4 � 
U.S. troops found thousands of boxes of white powder,
nerve agent antidote and Arabic documents on how to
engage in chemical warfare at an industrial site south
of Baghdad, a U.S. officer said Friday.

Col. John Peabody, engineer brigade commander of the
3rd Infantry Division, said the materials were found
Friday at the Latifiyah industrial complex 25 miles
south of Baghdad.

"It is clearly a suspicious site," Peabody said.

Peabody said troops found thousands of boxes, each of
which contained three vials of white powder, together
with documents written in Arabic that dealt with how
to engage in chemical warfare.

He also said they discovered atropine, used to counter
the effects of nerve agents.

The facility had been identified by the International
Atomic Energy Agency as a suspected chemical,
biological and nuclear weapons site. U.N. inspectors
visited the plant at least nine times, including as
recently as Feb. 18.

The facility is part of a larger complex known as the
Latifiyah Explosives and Ammunition Plant al Qa Qaa.

During the 1991 Gulf War, U.S. jets bombed the plant.




Meanwhile, signs that Iraq may use chemical weapons
are on the increase:

http://www.latimes.com/news/custom/showcase/la-war-chemwar4apr04.story



8:20 PM PST, April 3, 2003   
Iraqi 'Chatter' Threatens Use of Chemicals
 Intercepted electronic transmissions heighten effort
by U.S.-led troops to find any secret caches.
By Bob Drogin, Times Staff Writer


WASHINGTON -- Alarmed by intercepts of Iraqi
communications mentioning use of "special" weapons and
other fresh intelligence, U.S. special operations
teams and mobile units of scientists and weapons
experts have stepped up their search for suspected
Iraqi caches of chemical and biological weapons, U.S.
officials said Thursday.

The effort was given added urgency as armored columns
of U.S. troops poured across the "red line," a radius
about 50 miles around Baghdad, and began besieging the
outskirts of the capital.

U.S. officials had warned that crossing the line could
trigger a desperate counterattack by Iraqi artillery,
missiles or drone aircraft capable of spraying lethal
substances on massed U.S. troops. It's more difficult
to target such attacks on fast-moving troops spread
out across the desert.

But U.S. experts believe that Iraq can no longer rely
on biological weapons to stop or slow U.S. forces,
because microbe-based agents such as anthrax or
botulinum toxin may not take effect for days or weeks.

"Any biological attack would take too long now to have
a useful military effect," one official said.

Instead, U.S. military officials chiefly worry that
Iraqi troops may try to use such deadly nerve gases as
Tabun, sarin or VX. Such agents, which Iraq is known
to have produced in the past, attack the central
nervous system and can cause death in hours or even
minutes.

U.S. intelligence indicates shells and warheads filled
with chemical agents may have been stockpiled in
hidden arsenals in and around Baghdad, and are in the
custody of Republican Guard and Special Republican
Guard units that are trusted by the regime.

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told a
Pentagon briefing audience Thursday that "we've always
believed" the risk of chemical attack "increased the
closer that coalition forces got to Baghdad."

Although the Pentagon clearly hopes to avoid street
fighting in Baghdad, some officials say that the
danger of chemical attack is likely to recede if U.S.
forces are drawn into the city's concrete confines.
That's because poison gas would also endanger Iraqi
troops and civilians in urban combat.

"Once you're mixed up with them, it doesn't make any
tactical sense" to use chemical weapons, said a second
U.S. official, "unless they're just reaching out in
some irrational act."

The official said concerns about a possible
unconventional attack also have mounted in recent days
because of fresh electronic intercepts of Iraqi
military radio transmissions and other "chatter" that
use "euphemisms or code words" to refer to weapons of
mass destruction.

"There are allusions to using special weapons," the
official said. "There seem to be a lot more now."

Marines, already in protective suits, increased their
precautions as they approached Baghdad's perimeter.
They were ordered to keep special gloves and gas masks
close at hand, and to sleep with protective boots on
for the first time since the war began.

Special operations forces that have conducted
clandestine raids deep inside Iraqi lines against
suspected weapons facilities, and mobile teams of
weapons experts and scientists who search sites and
gather intelligence behind U.S. and British lines,
also have been ordered to intensify their efforts,
officials said.

No weapons of mass destruction have been used or
discovered so far in the war. U.S. and British troops
have recovered thousands of Iraqi chemical protection
suits, respirators and chemical-weapon antidotes at
several locations, but it's unclear whether they were
meant for offensive purposes.

President Bush has cited Iraqi President Saddam
Hussein's effort to produce such "weapons of terror"
as the chief justification for the war, and
administration officials say they remain convinced
that the regime still may use such weapons as a last
resort. Some skeptics, however, say the Bush
administration may have vastly overestimated Iraq's
capabilities and supplies.

The "mobile exploitation" teams of U.S. scientists,
intelligence operatives and weapons experts have
searched more than a half-dozen Iraqi factories,
ammunition dumps and other suspected sites since the
war began but found no proof of illegal weapons.

Based in Kuwait, they have compiled a list of more
than 1,000 potential weapons sites across Iraq. They
also have identified several hundred Iraqi scientists,
technicians and officials who were involved in the
covert procurement and production of illegal weapons.

So far, officials said Thursday, the special teams
have conducted no interviews with significant figures
in the Iraqi weapons program. "A lot of people of
interest in weapons of mass destruction are in Baghdad
and really aren't accessible," said a military
intelligence official.

The teams also have made little headway so far in
scrutinizing documents and other weapons-related
materials gathered in Iraq. "The process is just
starting," said another intelligence official.

"It may take years to find all of Iraq's weapons,"
warned Loren Thompson, a defense analyst.

But he added, "I'm certain they have them and I'm
certain they are actively considering using them at
this moment."

U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Stanley McChrystal said Thursday
that the military has "aggressively targeted" command
and control facilities and potential delivery systems
for weapons of mass destruction since the war began.

"We've tried to hit the artillery tubes that can shoot
chemical or biological weapons," he told reporters.
"We've tried to hit all of the rockets -- Ababil-100s,
Al-Samouds. We've tried to locate all the Scuds with
which he threatens his neighbors with chemical and
biological weapons."

But McChrystal said he could not explain why Hussein
had not launched whatever weapons he still has now
that U.S. troops have crossed the "red line" and
directly threaten his rule.

"We're not sure whether or not our deterrence has
worked," he said. "We're not sure whether or not our
disruption of his command and control may have stopped
him. It may be a conscious decision; can't tell. We
are assuming at this point that it may still come, and
therefore staying postured for that."

Other experts offered other reasons for why Iraq has
not used weapons of mass destruction, assuming it
still has them.

First, they say, Hussein has insisted for years that
he possesses no such weapons and his regime would
undermine whatever sympathy and credibility it has in
the international community if it should suddenly
admit that it does. It also would guarantee that U.S.
officials would show little mercy in the remaining
days of the war.

"Basically, they're committing suicide if they use
them," said Thompson.

It's possible, officials said, that the regime has not
had the time or opportunity to deliver weapons to
troops in the field. It's also possible that artillery
battalions, missile batteries and other units deployed
to fire such weapons were eliminated by airstrikes or
other attacks, or that covert attacks by U.S., British
and Australian special forces cut off crucial
communications needed to authorize a chemical or
biological attack.

Finally, some officials believe that Hussein may be
keeping his chemical weapons as a last-minute
bargaining chip to trade for survival or exile.

Asked why Hussein had not used any chemical or
biological weapons so far, Rumsfeld said the regime
may hope it can make a deal.

But if "they are holding out hope ... that there might
be a deal cut, the use of chemical weapons would
certainly end that prospect," he said. "They have to
be balancing that."

And he added there is "not even a remote possibility"
of a deal now short of unconditional surrender and the
forced removal of Hussein and his regime.

"I think it's over," said Col. William Taylor, a
military expert at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, who counts Secretary of State
Colin L. Powell and retired Army Gen. Barry R.
McCaffrey among his former pupils.

"If they use chemical weapons now, where are they
going to put them?" he asked. "If you use chemical or
biological weapons, there are so many risks, depending
on the weather and the way the wind is blowing. It
could blow right back in your face.

"We're very close to this whole thing being over and
the population in Baghdad is going to do what the
people did in Najaf -- throw up their arms and say,
'Thank God you're here.' "

Times staff writers Greg Miller in Washington and
Maggie Farley at the United Nations contributed to
this report. 


=====
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Giorgis               -                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Tonight I have a message for the brave and oppressed people of Iraq:
 Your enemy is not surrounding your country � your enemy is ruling your  
 country. And the day he and his regime are removed from power will be    
           the day of your liberation."  -George W. Bush 1/29/03

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to