http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/3909558.html

Democrats: Lowest-earning families denied child tax credit
David Firestone, New York Times 
  
Published May 30, 2003 TAXC30 

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Bush administration on Thursday defended the
decision of congressional negotiators to deny millions of
minimum-wage-earning families the increased child tax credit.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said the new tax law was
intended to help people who pay taxes, not those who are too poor to pay.

Democrats seized on the decision as an illustration of what they called
the essential unfairness of legislation that provides most of its
benefits to the wealthy.

They promised to propose a bill that would extend the increased credit to
those denied it: most families earning from $10,500 to $26,625. The
measure would cost $3.5 billion, and could embarrass Republicans if they
chose to vote against it.

"While the Republican tax break leaves no business behind, it leaves
behind millions of children from working-poor families," said Rep. Nancy
Pelosi, D-Calif., the House Democratic leader. "Faced with a choice
between giving a tax break to an elite few or helping millions of working
families, the Republicans once again chose to help their wealthy
friends."

Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, of South Dakota, said that helping
those families should be the first order of business when Congress
returns next week, and he wrote President Bush on Thursday saying the
Democrats would be happy to pass such a measure if Bush agreed.

Fleischer said the president would have signed a tax-cut bill that did
extend the credit to those families cited by the Democrats, but that
negotiators had to decide whether to help taxpayers or those who pay no
taxes.

"Does tax relief go to people who pay income taxes and forgive their
income taxes, or does it go above and beyond the forgiving of all income
taxes, and you actually get a check back from the government for more
than you ever owed in income taxes?" he said. "And this is part and
parcel of the debate over tax relief. This certainly does deliver tax
relief to the people who pay income taxes."

Fleischer also said the bill would wipe out all tax liability for 3
million taxpayers.

Bob McIntyre, director of the liberal research group Citizens for Tax
Justice, said he agreed with that calculation, mainly because the
increased child tax credit will help families who earn $26,625 to about
$40,000.

But most of those earning less do not qualify for the $400-a-child checks
that will be mailed this summer to higher-income-earning families,
because Republican negotiators, seeking to fit other tax cuts into the
$350 billion bill, dropped a Senate plan to help the lower-income-earning
families.

The plan would have changed the child-credit formula to allow families
earning just above the minimum wage to get refunds of all or part of the
$400.

Fleischer said that the millions of low-income Americans who owe no taxes
but receive tax credits were actually receiving a form of public
assistance, and that was fundamentally different from the tax breaks the
new bill gives to those higher-earning families that owe income taxes.

"By actually forgiving all income taxes and then giving people money
above and beyond that, it's not the same as the way other people on the
income scale are treated," he said. Low-income people, he added, already
are appreciative of the fact that they pay no income taxes yet benefit
from federal programs.

Democrats and some moderate Republicans, however, said that it was
essentially unfair to give the child tax credit to most middle-income
families but not to those lower on the income scale. The wealthiest
taxpayers do not benefit from the child credit, which phases out at
higher incomes.

Sen. Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine, said the lack of a benefit to
minimum-wage-earning families was one of the reasons she voted against
the bill. "This ill-founded decision creates a two-tier system under the
child tax credit, penalizing low-income working families who need the
help most," she said. "Not only is this unfair, but it further undermines
the stimulus portion of the child credit," because the lowest-income
people would be most likely to spend the refund.


---

'Governor Bush has not changed his position on 
abortion. He is no hypocrite (?). It was illegal when he had it 
done and he wants it to be illegal for everyone else, too. Fair 
is fair.'  -- Ari Fleischer
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to