On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 06:44:20PM -0500, The Fool wrote: > 5%.
So, on days that you post 4 or 5 articles to Brin-L, you have actually read 80 or 100 articles? Wow, I thought you said you were not "that well read". > All of them. Sure not every article is as coherent and to the point > as want them to be, but it is enough if they make some small point for > which I am trying to express. Almost all stories I post come from > links from slashdot, or Google NEWS, and few other major news sites. Well, if your purpose is to try to educate people here, or to try to persuade people to a point, or even to try to start a discussion, I would suggest that you need to filter more for quality. As I mentioned, your posts have made my "usually delete without reading" threshold since the S/N is so low. And apparently I am not the only one who thinks so. In the past month I estimate that, for me, your S/N is maybe 0.1. That is too low for me to bother with your posts. If you could get it up to 0.25 or 0.3, then I would be inclined to read them again. But right now your credibility is shot. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
