On 9 Jun 2003 at 15:06, Jeroen van Baardwijk wrote: > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Pensinger wrote: > > > Since I can't reply directly to Jeroens recent spamming, > > In fact, you *can* reply directly to me. As I said in a previous > message, the solution is quite simple. Hint: it's in the headers. > > And my messages aren't spam. Spam is unsollicited commercial e-mail.
No. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spam spam n. Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail. The key word there is USUALLY - UCE is the biggest problem but the commercial aspect is NOT necessary to make it spam. And I think I'll find out if your ISP likes it's members spamming. Mine wasn't amused about your complaint. > My messages are not unsollicited, as they are replies to on-list > messages, to which I would have replied on-list if that had been > possible. As that is *not* possible for obvious reasons, I must use > the method that comes closest to an on-list reply, which is to send > the reply directly to those who are active on the old list. Excuse me? I never opted-in to receive your E-mails. The standard these days for maling lists is a double opt-in. What you are doing is spam, plain and simple. Oh right, better see what NANAE have to say about that as well. (Hint: being banned is supposed to send a message to you about the fact that we DON'T want to read your E-mails). And...this E-mail, intended for you, is CC'd to [EMAIL PROTECTED] l.com. Do you follow the RFC's? If not, I'll put in a report to rfc- ignorant as well. I'll stop the moment you stop sending me E-mails. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
