--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> 
> I derived the applicable formulas for a
> space elevator and
> posted them to Brin-L several years ago. I've
> appended that to my post
> here if you want to try some numbers. I also
> included another article
> that talks about space elevators and gives a few
> useful numbers.
<snipped rest> 

Thanks for the re-post -- I'm afraid the math was over
my head, but the other articles were interesting.

Having read somewhere that "spider silk has greater
tensile strength than steel," I looked up a few
articles.  It seems that the properties of spider silk
that allow it to be both strong and resilient/elastic,
while still not understood, involve sheets of 'stiff'
alanine chains coupled with more flexible/elastic
protein sequences, twined together in different ways
for different types/uses of the silk.  It is
comparable to Kevlar (one article said 'tougher'), but
much lighter.

This article, about stress-strain curves and Young's
modulus of elasticity, gave some numbers I hope
someone else can play with (hint hint! :} ):
http://www.tiem.utk.edu/~mbeals/spider.html
"...From the stress-strain graph we can see that the
spiral's mean extensibility, which is the maximum
strain (or stretch) before breaking, was 476%, as
compared to the radii's mean extensibility of 39.4%
(data from K�hler & Vollrath not shown). The tensile
strength of the capture spiral is 1,338 MPa, while the
tensile strength of the radial thread is 1,154 MPa.
For comparison, the tensile strength of "mild" steel
is 400 MPa (in Vogel 1988, p. 185). The capture spiral
must absorb most of the kinetic energy from an
insect's initial impact, while the radial threads
serve primarily as scaffolding for the spiral..."
[radial silk is closer to dragline silk in properties
- DH]

http://www.discover.com/sept_01/featbiology.html
"...More research has been done on the dragline silk
of Nephila than on any other kind. But it is a long
way from being understood. A single thread of that
silk is perhaps three to five micrometers across. When
Vollrath started looking into it, people thought
dragline silk was a relatively simple composite
material, like fiberglass, consisting of stiff sheets
of crystallized protein floating in an elastic rubbery
matrix. But that, Vollrath has found, is not the
structure of the whole thread; it's the structure of a
single filament inside the thread� and there may be
thousands of such filaments, each only a few
nanometers across, too small to be seen with a typical
microscope, and perhaps bundled in some way that has
yet to be discerned. 

"That's what gives it this incredible tensile
strength, this whole microstructure," Vollrath says.
"If you're jumping off a bridge, would you prefer I
gave you a single rubber band or a thousand rubber
bands with the same total diameter? It's intuitive� if
you have a thousand, a few can snap and there are
still enough to hold you." The spider's dragline is
made even more snap-resistant, Vollrath thinks, by
long, fluid-filled channels that are interspersed
among the tightly packed filaments. Those channels may
help distribute the tensile forces and so stop a
nascent crack from ripping right across the thread..."


Dragline silk is being studied by the Army:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/06/020618072100.htm
"...And why is the U.S. Army interested in this
material? "The major interest is to use it as material
for bulletproof vests, armor and tethers; there are
many possibilities," said first author Emin Oroudjev,
a researcher at UC Santa Barbara. 

"At UC Santa Barbara, the focus is on the basic
research of learning how the protein folds and how it
is organized in the silk fiber. Using atomic force
microscopy and a molecular puller, the researchers are
getting clues from imaging and pulling the protein.
These observations help the researchers to model what
is happening in the silk gland when silk proteins are
assembling into spider dragline silk fibers..." 

Quite a few links are defunct, so I'm not sure the GM
goats that were supposed to mass-produce spider silk
in their milk (I am NOT making this up!) are still
being experimented with...medical applications would
exist too:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/01/0117_020117TVspidermammals.html

Nexia (the goat-folk) was still around in Jan 2002:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2002-01/nbi-nau011102.php

So, could the structure and properties of dragline
silk be helpful in the design of carbon nanotubules
for a space elevator? (Of course, I'm guessing you
wouldn't want it to be that elastic, but the structure
is intriguing.  Here are some graphics:)
http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk/motm/spider/page3h.htm
http://www.imb-jena.de/www_elmi/molcyto_spid.html
http://www.amonline.net.au/spiders/toolkit/silk/structure.htm

The latter site is part of an entire spider info fest
(fun!).

Debbi
Charlotte's Web Maru  :)

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to