Well, I've not been posting for a while because I've been overwhelmed with
1) Planning my parents' funerals 2) A heavy work load 3) Preparing for my wife's operation.
But, I've got a bit of time now, so I'll try to catch up on posts I owe an answer to.
I hope you've recovered from the stress of 1 and are coping well with the stress of 2, and best of luck with 3; I hope the prognosis is good.
I wouldn't say it's a post you owe me an answer to, but in the middle of another thread I mentioned an alternate interpretation of quantum mechanics along with a link to the original paper. I'd love to see your opinion of it when you get a chance. It's called the transactional interpretation, and John Cramer's paper on this interpretation can be found at:
http://www.npl.washington.edu/npl/int_rep/tiqm/TI_toc.html
It was originally published in July of 1986 in _Reviews of Modern Physics_.
Reggie Bautista
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
