http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030730-040600-4102r

Even if the only evidence forensic analysts can pull from a crime scene is a
fingerprint smudged beyond recognition, a new technique developed by
Canadian scientists soon could harvest enough DNA from the print to produce
a genetic identity.
The novel system can extract DNA in only 15 minutes, even if a print has
been stored for a year. Scientists expect the invention to help
crime-fighters solve mysteries, and already are in talks with the Royal
Canadian Mounted Police. In addition, researchers predict the technology
could be at least twice as cheap as existing DNA collection methods.

"If you wanted to use blood as a source of DNA, you have fear of
contamination, people who don't want to give it, storage issues, and you
have to sign a lot of paperwork to get it," research scientist Maria
Viaznikova of the Ottawa University Heart Institute in Canada told United
Press International. "We can now have DNA reliably and simply with our
method."

Viaznikova said her team's method consistently yields 10 billionths of a
gram of DNA, on average, from a single fingerprint. The findings were
revealed at the American Society for Microbiology's nanotechnology
conference in New York earlier this month. Although 10 "nanograms" might not
sound like much, for DNA analysis, even 0.1 nanogram is enough, Viaznikova
said. "Scientists try not to use less than 5 to 10 nanograms, so this is
fine."

She said forensic scientists have known for about five years that
fingerprints contain DNA. However, commonly used extraction techniques need
several hours or even days of lab work. "We can do it in 15 minutes," she
added.

The new extraction technique is under patent. When compared with existing
methods, "it is at least as twice less expensive, maybe more," Viaznikova
said.

The most immediate application such a technique could find is with
forensics, said molecular biologist Margaret Wallace of John Jay College in
New York and one-time DNA analyst for the city's chief medical examiner's
office.

"It could save a lot of time, particularly given we have this huge backlog
on DNA that needs to be analyzed," Wallace told UPI. "There are hundreds of
thousands of samples that need to be looked at now."

Wallace still wants to know how well the process works on fingerprints
gleaned from a variety of surfaces and kept in a variety of temperature and
humidity conditions. "It's also possible that some people leave more DNA in
their prints than others," she said.

Because the method is so simple and cheap, with far less overhead required
than needle-based DNA sampling, experts say this could help make DNA
gathering a commonplace activity -- thereby also raising privacy issues.

"DNA is unique, extremely revealing about you and your family members,"
privacy specialist Jay Stanley of the American Civil Liberties Union in
Washington, D.C., told UPI. "This advance really highlights the need for
laws to protect the privacy in the face of these kinds of technologies."

Stanley said because genetics experts have told him it inevitably will
become easier to test DNA, "we need legal frameworks to figure out how to
protect privacy in the face of this." For example, silicone chips from
biophysicist Stephen Quake's lab at the California Institute of Technology,
in Pasadena, could in the next 10 years sequence an entire person's genetic
code cheaply and in a few days, he noted.

"I don't think anybody objects to samples from crime scenes. I think using
DNA to catch murderers is a fine thing," Stanley said. "But we need to be
cognizant of greater implications. We're going to be facing issues about how
to keep DNA private from lawyers, governments, insurance companies, even
nosy neighbors. It raises issues of employment discrimination, because
employers have a natural incentive to hire healthy workers, and always have
an incentive to discriminate against you by DNA, as long as health insurance
is provided by the workplace."

He added: "Or think about schoolchildren checking out each other's genetic
profiles, or having profiles posted on the Internet. The fact is, there are
heavy incentives to collect this information."

Electronic Frontier Foundation staff technologist Dan Moniz said he thinks
the technique could be helpful to nab crooks, but he wonders about further
implications in law.

"People already have fingerprints taken of them. Will it just become part of
the standard booking procedure? Will you be notified that they're taking
DNA? Can you refuse to give fingerprints if you don't want DNA taken?" he
asked.

Moniz told UPI there are four directions he would like to see the question
of DNA collection from prints go. "First, I want to know who's using this
technology. I want to be notified right up front, at the police department,
hospital, HMO, anything. No surreptitious extraction," he said.

"I should have a right of refusal and I should receive no special treatment
if I do refuse it," he continued. "Finally, I should have a clear statement
of who has full control of it, to make sure it does not get (contracted)
out."

Moniz said the problems of outsourcing the collection of genetic information
is a violation of privacy that goes beyond the potential for discrimination.
"Will you get marketed on a genetic level? To be somewhat facetious, is this
a new piece of the puzzle of the already omni-present spam about penile
enhancement?"

Although the method "can be used for DNA identification for sure,"
Viaznikova said -- people have stretches of inactive "junk DNA" whose
patterns are as unique to them as their fingerprints -- she added that her
group also has a more ambitious goal for their method: extracting enough
undamaged DNA from fingerprints to study the active DNA that actually drive
survival.

"Our interest is in the heart. If a patient goes to a doctor, in future
perhaps the doctor can identify if a person has some kind of gene that can
one day lead to heart failure," Viaznikova said. "We think we can use our
technique for DNA profiling. It's not proved yet, but we're going to try and
do it."



xponent

Tracks Maru

rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to