I thought the recent story of the man who had some
return of vision (after ~40 years of blindness)
following corneal stem cell transplant was
fascinating, especially WRT how the brain requires
experience/input to develop certain abilities
correctly:

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/living/Healthology/HS_seeingagain_030827.html
"...A chemical accident left him completely blind at
the age of 3. In 2000, 43 years after May lost his
sight, he had an experimental limbal stem cell
transplant in his right eye that restored his vision.

"The procedure is a rare one, performed in perhaps 100
people each year in the United States and is not
related to retina or optic nerve transplantation.

"Now that May, a California businessman, can see, he
has found sight is not that simple. His world consists
of abstract shapes and colors, but not
three-dimensional shapes. He can't identify his wife
from her face alone, nor can he tell the difference
between male and female faces most of the time. Facial
expressions remain a mystery...

"...Functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI,
revealed the parts of May's brain normally responsible
for processing faces and objects were inactive. When
he was shown something moving, however, that part of
his brain showed high levels of activity.

""The parts of the brain that were connected to the
motion-processing areas were fine, but the information
that was being sent to areas that process objects and
faces wasn't lighting up at all," says study author
Ione Fine, who led the project while she was a
research scientist at the University of California at
San Diego. "It's very much a wiring thing. He can see.
He can't make sense of it."

"Because he had blinded so early in life, May's brain
never had the chance to "learn" how to see. "Infants
just out of the womb see poorly," says Dr. Ivan
Schwab, professor of ophthalmology at the University
of California, Davis and a spokesman for the American
Academy of Ophthalmology. "The brain has to put it
together and the early years are very important..."

The SciAmer article is short:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0007C81F-8540-1F46-B0B980A841890000

Here is a NEJM abstract of one study:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/340/22/1697

And this might be the 'ancestor' of Geordie LaForge's
artificial eyes [I forget which NextGen movie]:

http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/gma/goodmorningamerica/gma020508artificialretina.html
"...The brothers invented a wafer-thin array of
photocells that are surgically placed beneath the
patient's defective retina. Only six patients have
braved the historic surgery � and so far the results
have been promising. Chow said the study was conducted
to determine whether the device is safe..." 

Debbi
Jeepers Creepers Maru  ;)

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to