"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> Although I realize it's not the point the author of the article was trying
> to make, nor the reason it was posted to the list, a question which arises
> after reading the article is why there are apparently not any private
> schools available which emphasize that their academic standards are
> superior to those of the "failing public schools" but which are not
> associated with any religious organization? Are there indeed no such
> non-religious schools, or is there some other reason why that is not a
> valid choice in this case?
There probably are some. I bet they also charge a LOT of
money. Catholic schools don't, for various reasons.
---David
Vow of poverty, anyone?
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
