http://customwire.ap.org/dynamic/stories/S/SPECIAL_ED_TESTING?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT

>>"...When it comes time to take the standardized
tests that the federal government uses to measure
public schools, many of Harper's students at White
Mountain Middle School merely pick answers at random,
not realizing the potentially severe consequences for
their school.

Across the country this year, thousands of schools
were deemed "failing" because of the test performance
of special ed students.

The results have provoked feelings of fury,
helplessness and amusement in teachers like Harper,
who say that because of some of their students'
disabilities, there is no realistic way to ever meet
the expectations of a new federal law backed by the
Bush administration that requires that 99 percent of
all children be performing at or above grade level by
2014.

If schools fail to meet those targets, they risk being
taken over by the state or private companies; teachers
can lose their jobs....

...The government is defending the special education
portion of the law, though officials said some changes
are in the works that would give more leeway to the
most seriously disabled children and their teachers.

However, the Education Department does not want to let
all special education students and their teachers off
the hook, said Ronald Tomalis, acting assistant
secretary for elementary and secondary education.

"There have been low expectations for some of these
children all along," he said. "And that's not because
of mental abilities, but because of poor instruction
received in the early grades. We need to challenge
schools that these children can achieve. Sure, they
will need an intensive program, but they can be
brought up to grade level."

For more seriously disabled children, he said, a
proposed change to the law would let 1 percent of all
children in a district skip the grade-level exams and
instead take a test tailored to their abilities. If
they scored well on that alternative, it could be
counted in their school's favor..."<<

This sounds like one of the stupidest things I've ever
heard, and one of my CO collegues with 20 years in
speech therapy/special education commented (when I
asked if this was true): "It is not only true, it is
actually worse than this.  Students who are in a
persistant vegetative state have been required to take
the test from time to time, students who do not yet
speak English, students with severe emotional
disorders, physical problems, etc.  It is absolutely
absurd."

Debbi

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to