Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 9:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite
>
> > At 10:12 PM 12/23/2003 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> As opposed, of course, to how well the Left policies it own.
> > >>
> > >
> > >Is that always your answer? "You're another"? Deal with the issue
> at hand:
> > >Rush Limbaugh is demanding an accommodation for himself that he has
> > expressly
> > >insisted, loudly and without compassion or mercy, not be accorded
> anyone
> > else
> > >who has done similar things.
> >
> > This is false. I know of no instance in which Rush Limbaugh has
> not
> > accorded anyone else the privacy of their medical records.
>
> I think the point Tom is riffing on is that Rush has repeatedly
> claimed that there is no constitutional right to privacy.
> That would likely apply also to medical records.
Hm. What are his views on attorney-client privilege?
I'd say doctor-patient privilege is just one step below that -- has he
said anything in the past about doctor-patient privilege? Does anyone
know?
Other "privacy" rights may have less protection. Or he may think they
should have less protection.
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
