> From: John D. Giorgis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> At 10:32 PM 1/12/2004 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >In a message dated 1/12/2004 7:31:46 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >> Lastly, what is so wrong with the Bush Administration saying that we
> >> believe that we should invade Iraq for reasons A, B, C, D, E, and
F.....
> >> but we recognize that reason "D" is a bit complex/disputed, and that
"D" is
> >> the reason that skeptics would be most receptive to, and so we are
going to
> >> spend most of our timearguing for "D" as that is the reason that
will get
> >> us the most votes?     It is the nature of the republic and the
nature of
> >> the United Nations that you don't spend a lot of time making a case
based
> >> on reasons that *you* believe, but aren't like to convince many of
the
> >> swing-congresspersons and swing-ambassadors who will be 
> >> doing the voting.
> >
> >Well one reason is that it is dishonest not to state your real
intentions.
> 
> But when you true intentions include taking away arguments Al Qaeda
uses in
> recruitment videos - isn't emphasizing other reason - reasons you
> nevertheless also wholeheartedly believe, BTW  - your *moral*duty* as
> President of the United States?

A 'moral duty' to Lie to the american people to foment wars of agression?
 One has to wonder which god this president serves.  It appears he
prefers Lucifer.

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to