Watching my son, who is just over 2 1/2, it occurs to me he is
significantly more advanced than my daughter was at this age. I think
that my daughter and son were both winners of the genetic lottery when
it comes to intelligence, and I think they are fairly evenly matched in
that area.  Looking back, the major difference is what they have been
watching on TV.

Before I go any farther, and before someone jumps on this, I DON'T make
it habit to make the TV a babysitter. I do  monitor how much they watch
TV and what they are watching. Now, having said that....

The major differences are that my daughter grew up watching Barney and
Big Comfy Couch, and my son has grown up watching Blue's Clues and The
Wiggles.

I don't think he is doing anything that any other average 2 year is not
capable of. 

His biggest TV influence has been Blue's Clues. I did a little research
as well as watch a documentary about the show and apparently they take 8
to 10 months to create every episode. That includes the research,
writing, sign offs by several child psychologists and then children that
are their test audience. Also, they air the same episode every day for
one week to give the target age group repetition that helps them retain
what they are watching.

The other influential show is an Australian show called The Wiggles. The
first time I saw this show I would have bet money that they were just
the human version of the TeleTubbies - questionable sexuality and all.
However, after actually watching a few episodes (with an open mind),
they have some brilliant musical talent as well as some great children
singers and dancers. If I am not mistaken, most (if not all) of the
children on the show are kids of the cast and crew. I don't know if my
son is attracted to this show because he is musically inclined, of if
this show has been influential in helping that talent develop - or both
or neither :-)


Gary

Just some Sunday morning thoughts as I sit here and watch the snow storm
develop that is about to dump 7 inches of snow on us as well as a
coating of ice on top of that.


PS - It is a good thing I actually read over these mails before I send
them. I just noticed that I accidentally pasted a term concerning "organ
size enhancement" (not the actual term!) into the subject line.  Just
before I wrote this, I was adding to my Mailwasher filters and still had
that one very descriptive term in the Windows clipboard. How
embarrassing that could have been !






 

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to