----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John D. Giorgis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: Federal Marriage Amendment


> At 06:49 PM 2/17/2004 -0600 Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> >At 06:38 PM 2/17/04, Erik Reuter wrote:
> >Did anyone say that it does not count?  John said that he "does not
believe
> >in it", which I presume is because the Catholic church discourages
> >it.  AFAIK, the Catholic church does not teach that babies born
through IVF
> >are sub-human, or indeed anything but fully human.  (If I am wrong
on this,
> >I'd appreciate correction from someone who knows what the Catholic
church
> >teaches.)
>
> More than just artificial insemination, it is certainly possibly for
a
> lesbian woman to have sex with a man who is not her partner to
become
> impregnated.   I've  conceded that in those cases there may be a
compelling
> interest for the child to be adopted by her biological mother,
rather than
> be placed in a family that meets her expectation of having a father
and a
> mother - but I don't believe that the government should
*incentivise* such
> outcomes.
>
> My problem with IVF is that a typical step of the procedure is
selective
> abortion, and I am at least intellectually consistent about my
belief that
> human life begins at conception.
>

"Eeeeevery sperm is sacred........."


xponent
Consistency Is The Hobgoblin Of Small Minds Maru
rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to