http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3596033.stm

US Secretary of State Colin Powell has admitted that evidence he
submitted to the United Nations to justify war on Iraq may have been
wrong.
In February last year he told the UN Security Council that Iraq had
developed mobile laboratories for making biological weapons.

On Friday he conceded that information "appears not to be... that
solid".

The claim failed to persuade the Security Council to back the war, but
helped sway US public opinion.

Mr Powell said he hoped the commission appointed to investigate
pre-war intelligence on Iraq would examine whether the intelligence
community was justified in backing the claim.

Doubts

Doubts have been widely cast on the existence of the mobile labs, not
least by the former US chief weapons inspector in Iraq, David Kay, who
now says does not know whether Iraq ever had a mobile weapons
programme.

No evidence of weapons of mass destruction has emerged in Iraq since
the end of the war.

Mr Powell said the US intelligence officers "indicated to me" that the
information about the mobile labs was reliable, and "I made sure it
was multi-sourced".

"Now, if the sources fell apart we need to find out how we've gotten
ourselves in that position," he said.

"I have discussions with the CIA about it," he said, without providing
further details.

It is the first time Mr Powell has acknowledged key evidence he used
to make the case for war may have been wrong, says the BBC's Jannat
Jalil in Washington.

Previously, he has only said that he does not know if he would have
backed the invasion had he believed Iraq did not possess banned
weapons.

This admission by Mr Powell could further hurt the credibility of the
Bush administration in what is an election year, our correspondent
says.


Intelligence questioned

Mr Powell referred to several intelligence sources on the trailers
during his Security Council speech, but at least two have been
questioned in recent weeks.

News organisations have reported that US intelligence officials
considered one source unreliable even before Mr Powell's speech.

The Los Angeles Times also alleged that another source had been widely
discredited and was never even interviewed by US officials.
Mr Powell's admission comes as the US's intelligence record is
scrutinised over the attacks on 11 September, 2001.

Mr Powell last month appeared before a commission looking into the
attacks, and denied that the Bush administration ignored the threat
from al-Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden.

He was questioned following allegations from ex-White House
counter-terrorism aide Richard Clarke that Mr Bush and his colleagues
were so preoccupied with launching a war on Iraq, that they missed the
growing threat from al-Qaeda.



xponent

If Only He Ran Maru

rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to