<<http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2004/030404saudisflew.htm>
>

US Government Documents Show 160 Saudis Flew from the US Between
September 11 and September 15, 2001

Customs & Border Protection Document Details Saudi Departures, Dates and
Flight Information

Questions Concerning Saudi Flight from Kentucky on September 13, 2001
Remain Unanswered

Judicial Watch | April 3 2004

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that
investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released US
Customs and Border Protection (�CBP�) agency documents obtained under the
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (�FOIA�) detailing the
departure of 160 subjects of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, �including but
not limited to members of the House of Saud and/or members of the Bin
Laden family,� between September 11, 2001 and September 15, 2001. The
documents are available on the Judicial Watch Internet site by clicking
here (Adobe Acrobat Reader required).

The CBP document, dated February 24, 2004, lists the birth date, visa
status, citizenship, date of departure, port of departure, departing
airline code, and flight number for each Saudi subject who left the
country at a time when the US government had supposedly restricted all
commercial and private air traffic through US airspace. Notably, the
names were not provided.

Judicial Watch filed its FOIA request on October 7, 2003, with the
Department of Homeland Security, the Central Intelligence Agency, the
Federal Aviation Administration, the State Department, the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, the Justice Department and the Department of
Transportation. To date, CBP is the only agency to have responded to the
FOIA request in a substantive manner. CBP claims to have no responsive
records concerning a reported departure of a large number of Saudis from
Blue Grass Airport in Lexington, Kentucky on September 13, 2001.

�Why is it the bin Laden family and other Saudi nationals were given
special permission to flee US jurisdiction in the days following
September 11, 2001? Evidently, the FBI never bothered to question this
group. We hope this list does not turn out to be a terrorist �most
wanted� list,� stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

----------
----------

<<http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2004/04/11/unasked_quest
ions/>>

Unasked questions The 9/11 commission should ask who authorized the
evacuation of Saudi nationals in the days following the attacks 
By Craig Unger, 4/11/2004

IN ITS TOUGH QUESTIONING of Richard Clarke and Condoleezza Rice, the 9/11
commission has already shown itself to be more resolute than some
skeptics predicted. Many Americans now realize that multiple warnings of
an Al Qaeda attack on American soil crossed the desks of Bush
administration officials in the months leading up to 9/11. The
administration's previously unchallenged narrative has begun to unravel.

   
But when hearings resume on Tuesday, we may learn exactly how tough the
commission is prepared to be. This time the stars will be Attorney
General John Ashcroft and FBI director Robert S. Mueller III, among
others. When they testify -- especially Mueller -- we will see whether or
not the commission has the stomach to address what may be the single most
egregious security lapse related to the attacks: the evacuation of
approximately 140 Saudis just two days after 9/11.

This episode raises particularly sensitive questions for the
administration. Never before in history has a president of the United
States had such a close relationship with another foreign power as
President Bush and his father have had with the Saudi royal family, the
House of Saud. I have traced more than $1.4 billion in investments and
contracts that went from the House of Saud over the past 20 years to
companies in which the Bushes and their allies have had prominent
positions -- Harken Energy, Halliburton, and the Carlyle Group among
them. Is it possible that President Bush himself played a role in
authorizing the evacuation of the Saudis after 9/11? What did he know and
when did he know it?

Let's go back to Sept. 13, 2001, and look at several scenes that were
taking place simultaneously. Three thousand people had just been killed.
The toxic rubble of the World Trade Center was still ablaze. American
airspace was locked down. Not even Bill Clinton and Al Gore, who were out
of the country, were allowed to fly home. And a plane bearing a
replacement heart for a desperately ill Seattle man was forced down short
of its destination by military aircraft. Not since the days of the Wright
Brothers had American skies been so empty.

But some people desperately wanted to fly out of the country. That same
day, Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, the Saudi Arabian
ambassador to the United States and a long-time friend of the Bush
family, dropped by the White House. He and President George W. Bush went
out to the Truman Balcony for a private conversation. We do not know
everything they discussed, but the Saudis themselves say that Prince
Bandar was trying to orchestrate the evacuation of scores of Saudis from
the United States despite the lockdown on air travel.

Meanwhile, a small plane in Tampa, Fla. took off for Lexington, Ky.
According to former Tampa cop Dan Grossi and former FBI agent Manny
Perez, who were on the flight to provide security, the passengers
included three young Saudis. Given the national security crisis, both
Grossi and Perez were astonished that they were allowed to take off. The
flight could not have taken place without White House approval.

The plane taking off from Tampa was the first of at least eight aircraft
that began flying across the country, stopping in at least 12 American
cities and carrying at least 140 passengers out of the country over the
next week or so. The planes included a lavishly customized Boeing 727
airliner that was equipped with a master bedroom suite, huge flat-screen
TVs, and a bathroom with gold-plated fixtures. Many of the passengers
were high-ranking members of the royal House of Saud. About 24 of them
were members of the bin Laden family, which owned the Saudi Binladin
Group, a multibillion-dollar construction conglomerate.

All this occurred at a time when intelligence analysts knew that 15 of
the 19 hijackers were Saudi, that Saudi money was one of the major forces
behind Al Qaeda, and that the prime suspect -- Osama bin Laden -- was
Saudi as well.

For its part, the Bush administration has erected the proverbial stone
wall on the topic of the Saudi evacuation. The White House told me that
it is "absolutely confident" the Sept. 13 flight from Tampa did not take
place. The FBI said "unequivocally" it played no role in facilitating any
flights. The Federal Aviation Administration said that the
Tampa-to-Lexington flight was not in the logs and did not take place.

But they are all wrong.

. . .

How can I be sure? I have interviewed not only Dan Grossi and Manny
Perez, but also sources who helped orchestrate the flights. I tracked
down photos of the interior of one of the planes. Former counterterrorism
czar Richard Clarke told me, and later the 9/11 commission, about
discussions in the White House that allowed the flights to begin.

Clarke says his advice was that the Saudis should be able to leave only
after they had been vetted by the FBI. A basic procedure in any crime
investigation is to interview friends and relatives of the primary
suspect. When I talked to FBI special agents who participated in the
Saudi evacuation, however, they said that they identified the passengers
boarding the flights but did not have lengthy interviews with them.

"Here you have an attack with substantial links to Saudi Arabia," says
John L. Martin, a former Justice Department official who supervised
investigation and prosecution of national security offenses for 18 years.
"You would want to talk to people in the Saudi royal family and the Saudi
government, particularly since they have pledged cooperation."

Robert Mueller had taken over at the FBI just one week before 9/11 and
cannot be held responsible for the bureau's shortcomings before the
attacks. But he should be asked about the departure of the Saudis. How is
it possible that this could have happened? Did the White House order the
evacuation -- and thereby interfere in an investigation into the murder
of nearly 3,000 people?

If such interviews had taken place, investigators might have uncovered a
trove of intelligence. During the summer of 2001, just a few months
before 9/11, several of the bin Ladens attended the wedding of Osama's
son in Afghanistan, where Osama himself was present. Carmen bin Laden, an
estranged sister-in-law of the Al Qaeda leader, has said she suspects
many family members have continued to aid and abet him. Could the bin
Ladens have shed light on these assertions? Two relatives, Abdullah and
Omar bin Laden, had been investigated by the FBI as recently as September
2001 for their ties to the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, which has
allegedly funded terrorism. The 9/11 commission should ask Mueller if
they were on board. I have also obtained documents showing that Abdullah
and Omar were being investigated by the FBI in September 2001. Mueller
should be asked about the status of that investigation.

The Clinton administration had attempted to crack down on the Saudi
funding of Islamic charities that funneled money to terrorists. More
recently we have since had one revelation after another about Saudi
royals who "inadvertently" funded terrorists. The Commission should ask
Mueller if the Saudis who were allowed to leave were involved in
financing terrorism. How could the FBI be sure without seriously
interrogating them?

In addition, I have obtained passenger lists for four of the Saudi
evacuation flights. (The documents can be seen at my website,
www.houseofbush.com.) Out of several dozen names on those lists, the most
astonishing is that of the late Prince Ahmed bin Salman.

A prominent figure in the Saudi royal family, Prince Ahmed is best known
in this country as the owner of War Emblem, winner of the 2002 Kentucky
Derby. But his name is of interest for another reason. As reported last
year by Gerald Posner in "Why America Slept," Prince Ahmed not only had
alleged ties to Al Qaeda, but may also have known in advance that there
would be attacks on 9/11. According to Posner, Abu Zubaydah, an Al Qaeda
operative who was part of Osama bin Laden's inner circle and was captured
in 2002, made these assertions when he was interrogated by the CIA. The
commission should ask Mueller about Zubaydah's interrogation. They should
also ask whether the FBI interrogated Prince Ahmed before his departure.

But Prince Ahmed will never be able to answer any questions because not
long after the CIA interrogation, he died of a heart attack at the age of
43. Yet we do know that he was on one of the flights.

. . .

That leaves the question of the White House's participation in expediting
the departure of so many Saudis who may have been able to shed light on
the greatest crime in American history.

Is it possible that the long relationship between President Bush's family
and the House of Saud led Bush to turn a blind eye to the Saudi role in
Islamic fundamentalist terrorism? Rather than aggressively seeking
justice for the victims of 9/11, did the president instead authorize the
departure of rich Saudi royals without even subjecting them to
interrogation?

That may be the most difficult question of all for the commission to
tackle. If the commission dares to confront this issue, it will
undoubtedly be accused of politicizing the most important national
security investigations in American history -- in an election year, no
less. If it does not, it risks something far worse -- the betrayal of the
thousands who lost their lives that day, and of the living who want
answers.

Craig Unger, the former editor of Boston Magazine, is the author of
"House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret Relationship Between the
World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties" (Scribner, March 2004).


------

I Pledge Impertinence to the Flag-Waving of the Unindicted
Co-Conspirators of America
and to the Republicans for which I can't stand
one Abomination, Underhanded Fraud
Indefensible
with Liberty and Justice Forget it.

 -Life in Hell (Matt Groening)


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to