On 5/11/04 10:04 PM, "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other words, to the America that the New York Times addresses, > redneck still means bigot and - this is not putting it too strongly - > pervert. What would have clinched the dismissal of the Abu Ghraib > incidents as the excesses of people whom enlightened America despises > was the specifically sexual element of degradation." > > "If the US Army is now recruiting no-hopers from its social swamps, > then it must come to terms with the fact that they, too, are Americans, > who are prepared to die for their country - however alien their idea of > it may be to their condescending countrymen."
But don't people in New York and San Francisco pay a lot of money to people who will abuse them and put them on leashes?
So I've heard. And not just in NY and SF, or so I've heard . . .
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
